<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Do I Render The Best Quality Video With Video Editing Software?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techborneo.com/2009/07/06/how-do-i-render-the-best-quality-video-with-video-editing-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techborneo.com/2009/07/06/how-do-i-render-the-best-quality-video-with-video-editing-software/</link>
	<description>Laptop,Notebook,Computer Gadget,Cheap Computer parts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:15:59 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stu_the_</title>
		<link>http://techborneo.com/2009/07/06/how-do-i-render-the-best-quality-video-with-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-11794</link>
		<dc:creator>stu_the_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techborneo.com/2009/07/06/how-do-i-render-the-best-quality-video-with-video-editing-software/#comment-11794</guid>
		<description>Most output quality loss will depend on the input video file quality /capture quality.
The video card / ram etc on your PC will NOT affect the rendering quality as this is purely an internal process, so more ram etc makes the job quicker.
Personally I use Movie Edit pro (V 12) and find that all the effects are crisp and clear. It&#039;s also a whole lot cheaper than Premiere.
What you &quot;NEED&quot; for efficientr editing.
Lots of RAM, and a fast processor
2 HDDs for data storage. 1 for source material and 1 for the output. For large files this can make a noticable difference, and NOT external ones.
If you work comining large files a 3rd drive (seperate physical drive, not just a partition) can make this quicker still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most output quality loss will depend on the input video file quality /capture quality.<br />
The video card / ram etc on your PC will NOT affect the rendering quality as this is purely an internal process, so more ram etc makes the job quicker.<br />
Personally I use Movie Edit pro (V 12) and find that all the effects are crisp and clear. It&#8217;s also a whole lot cheaper than Premiere.<br />
What you &#8220;NEED&#8221; for efficientr editing.<br />
Lots of RAM, and a fast processor<br />
2 HDDs for data storage. 1 for source material and 1 for the output. For large files this can make a noticable difference, and NOT external ones.<br />
If you work comining large files a 3rd drive (seperate physical drive, not just a partition) can make this quicker still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
